The 260 was initially offered by Remington in the Model 7 and the Model 700 BDLSS. I wanted no part of the short-barreled M7. My ultimate goal
in a high powered rifle is maximum safe velocity with acceptable accuracy. I was pleased to see a 24" tube on the BDL (as it should be). Real rifles have at least
22" barrels. Like the Remington 700 Classics with short actions, the BDLSS 260 came with a 24" barrel. Classics in standard calibers with long actions have 22"
barrels. I don't know why Remington does this. Maybe the balance or maybe they think the short cases need the help of a longer tube. This M700 was very accurate with Nosler
120 grain Ballistic Tips and Hornady 95 grain V-max bullets. They both shot to one minute of angle at what I determined was safe maximum velocity. The rifle is still quick to
the shoulder and light to pack. I mounted a rather large Leupold 3.5x10AO for testing and plan to leave it on the gun for this deer season. I may go to a 2.5x8 next year, but
the varmint loads were so good, I decided to use it for coyote hunting this winter. This gun/scope/caliber is a great combination varmint/deer outfit.
The one thing I don't like is the removable magazine. They get lost, left in the truck, and never work as well as a standard magazine. Mine always fails to feed with only one
round in the magazine. I hate the looks and I really hate the malfunction. Other than that, it's a great gun. Very accurate, rugged, good looking as a plastic rifle can be, it
complements the new round very well.
UPDATE : Ruger's 1999 catalog shows the 260 is now chambered in their M77 bolt action.
The Cartridge: 260 Remington
The Remington 260 could be called a 6.5 x .308. The round is made by necking a .308 Winchester case down to accept a 6.5mm bullet. Why it took so long
to develop, I'll never know, but thank goodness, Remington finally did it. That case and bullet is one of the best combinations to come down the deer trail in a long time. I
think the surge in popularity in the old 6.5x55 Swedish Mauser had a lot to do with Remington's decision. I had been working on loads for the 6.5x55 in Mr. President's
Remington 700 Classic for a year or so when Remington announced the 260. I wanted to see what kind of velocity I could get from the new round, and compare it to the 6.5x55 in
a modern rifle. The results were very impressive with both the 260 and the 6.5x55, and are posted in the ODHA loading data.
I began with the goal of trying to safely reach the 3000 fps plateau with 120 grain bullets, something the 6.5x55 could not quite do. I began with some old standby powders like
IMR 4895, IMR4350, and Reloader 22 that worked well in the 6.5x55. The 4895 worked pretty well with lighter bullets, but none worked very well with the 120's. The case was too
small for the 4350, 4831, or the RL22. The 4895 was a little too hot, giving high pressure signs before the 3000 fps came along. The slower powders were showing potential, but
I ran out of case at about 2900 fps or so.
I next moved to the medium powders of H414 and IMR4320. H414 did OK but IMR4320 was the sleeping beauty. Over the magic 3000 and up to 3030 fps with 120 grain Nosler Ballistic
Tips. Made my day to say the least. After getting such good results with 4320 and 120's, I tested the 4320 with the 95 grain V-max and 140 grain Winchester soft points and
found this powder produced the best velocities with all bullet weights. Of course, there are other powders I haven't tested yet, but I seriously doubt these results could be
Field Tests 1998
Field testing began on October 24th, opening day of the 1998 Georgia deer season. I'd like to tell you about the big buck I got, but as luck would have it, the tests so far
have been only on does. The load for all the deer taken was the 120 grain Nosler Ballistic Tip bullet, pushed by 43.0 grains of IMR 4320 powder. Instrumental muzzle velocity
for the load is 3030 feet per second.
So far this season, I have taken two deer with the Remington 260. Both were does, one weighed 110 pounds and one 140 pounds. The shot on the 140 pounder was typical lung shot
at 75-80 yards. The shot entered near the rear of the lung area on the right side and angled slightly downward and forward and exited on the left side on the front lower
portion of the lung area. The Ballistic Tip bullet is designed to expand pretty rapidly and do massive damage to the internal organs and it indeed does this well. The entrance
hole was larger and had more destructive appearance on the ribs than the exit hole. The deer stayed on it's feet and ran about 30 yards. The second deer was a different story.
The shot was about 100 yards and the deer was quartering toward me. The shot entered just behind the right shoulder and did not exit. The deer stayed on it's feet and ran
about 50 yards. The Ballistic Tip did a good job on the lungs, but I was disappointed that it did not completely penetrate the small doe. The bullet did not hit the shoulder
bone, but just failed to pass through the body cavity.
Although both deer went down pretty quickly, I am not sure if the Ballistic Tip is the best choice for this caliber. If the 120 grain Ballistic Tip in this caliber had to take
a large buck with a less than perfect lung shot, say through the shoulder bone, the place I really like to shoot bucks, it may not penetrate deep enough for a quick kill. I
think I will go to the Nosler Partition 125 grain bullet or the 120 Barns X-Bullet next season. Either of these bullets will give better penetration and stay together when a
120 Ballistic Tip might disintegrate on the shoulder of a tough old buck.
Some would say go to a heavier 140 bullet, but I disagree. Up to a hundred yards there's not much difference in energy and trajectory, but on the long shots between 200 and 300
yards, the 120-125 grain bullets shoot flatter and hit harder. The small case can't produce enough velocity with the larger 140 grain bullet to match the 125's. Zeroed at 200
yards, the 140 will be about 3 inches lower, and retain about 250 ft/lbs less energy than a 125 grain bullet.
I know a lot of you don't give a hoot about all these facts and figures and just want a practical answer about the 260's performance. This little round has about the same power
and and shoots as flat as a 270 Winchester, but gives it to you in a lighter, short action rifle. And if you are a hand loader, it will save you powder. It is also a much
better choice for a dual purpose deer/varmint rifle than the 243 or 270.
Stay tuned for varmint testing with the 95 gn Hornady V-max and more deer testing with the 125 gn Nosler Partition.